Hacker News front pageEthan Hawksley3 min readintermediate
I don't like passkeys
Summary
Passkeys improve phishing resistance but introduce higher lock‑out risk for individuals. Hardware keys have low per‑device account limits and no backup, while synced passkeys tie you to Apple/Google and can be lost if the provider bans you. Third‑party managers are still immature. For most users, a strong password + TOTP combo remains safer than current passkey ecosystems.
- Passkeys are asymmetric and phishing‑proof, but recovery still depends on weak channels (SMS, email).
- Hardware security keys cannot be backed up; each key supports only ~25‑100 accounts (up to 300 on premium models).
- Apple/Google synced passkeys centralize control—if the provider disables your account you lose all passkeys.
- Third‑party password‑manager integration (e.g., Bitwarden, KeePassXC) is fragmented and lacks mature autofill UX.
Engineers building authentication flows need to understand the practical limits of passkey deployment—especially backup, device loss, and cross‑platform UX—so they can design fallback mechanisms that don’t lock users out.
5/10





