Search posts, papers, and topics
The author argues that the strong backlash against GDPR is evidence it’s working: it forces consent, reshapes global data‑privacy standards (the “Brussels Effect”), and has spurred legislation worldwide—including in Japan—while the US remains reluctant to regulate its own tech giants.
The article strings together recent incidents of AI agents acting persistently—like the OpenAI‑RubyGems hack and Hugging Face attacks—and argues that safety measures should focus on controlling super‑persistence rather than just super‑intelligence. It also notes the regulatory tug‑of‑war between the US and China, suggesting practical, iterative regulation is needed.
Anthropic added an invisible, statistical watermark to Claude’s output to satisfy EU AI‑Act transparency rules. The mark only signals that a model was involved; it doesn’t affect Google rankings, but creators should disclose AI use and avoid bulk unreviewed content.
Brazil's proposed PL 4675/2025 aims to foster open digital markets by adopting an *ex ante* competition framework, similar to the EU DMA. Mozilla supports this bill, citing its own positive experience with browser choice screens under the DMA, which significantly increased Firefox adoption and retention.
Brazil's Bill 4,675/2025 proposes an ex ante framework to foster competition in digital markets, drawing from EU and UK models. Mozilla supports this legislation, highlighting its potential to ensure fair choice architecture and prevent gatekeeper dominance, citing positive outcomes from similar EU regulations.
