proomt

Search

Search posts, papers, and topics

All posts

Bjørn Johansen2 min readintermediate

The pursuit of excellence does not need justification

Summary

Opinion piece arguing that engineers should pursue excellence without needing to justify it, using anecdotes about a fast terminal emulator and a WordPress menu cache to illustrate how over‑engineering can yield unexpected downstream benefits, while also acknowledging the practical need for “good enough” decisions.

  • Building faster, higher‑quality tools can create indirect benefits for unrelated projects.
  • Improvements raise the baseline for future work, enabling tighter feedback loops and more experimentation.
  • “Good enough” is a short‑term scheduling heuristic; excellence is a long‑term direction.

Highlights a mindset trade‑off that many engineers face: balancing immediate delivery constraints against investing in higher‑quality, potentially over‑engineered solutions that may pay off later.

3/10

Related reading

  1. Why I'm still bearish on LLMs after Navier-Stokes

    The author argues that despite headline successes (e.g., Navier‑Stokes proof, security exploits), current frontier LLMs still require heavy human oversight and rigorous specifications that are costly to produce. Reward‑hacking, narrow generalization, and the need for domain‑expert spec writing limit autonomous deployment to only a few niche domains (high‑failure‑cost work, tightly defined tasks,…

    Hacker News front pagedank.systems5 minHN487644lobste.rs49
  2. Use Curiosity, Craft, and Care to Decide What AI Should Write

    The post proposes a three‑principle framework—Curiosity, Craft, and Care—to decide how much AI should author each artifact in a software development workflow. It argues that AI can be used aggressively for exploratory, disposable outputs (Curiosity) but should be limited for artifacts that commit the team to decisions (Craft) and for communications that require personal ownership (Care). The auth…

    Atomic Objectatomicobject.com4 min