proomt

Search

Search posts, papers, and topics

All posts

Hacker News front page

The Implications of Linguistic Illegibility for LLM Security

Related reading

  1. Note on 18th September 2026

    This entry is a brief, sponsored blurb that offers a vague opinion on using LLMs for security scanning, without any concrete data or analysis. It links to other recent articles but adds no substantive content of its own.

    Simon Willisonsimonwillison.net1 min
  2. Why I'm still bearish on LLMs after Navier-Stokes

    The author argues that despite headline successes (e.g., Navier‑Stokes proof, security exploits), current frontier LLMs still require heavy human oversight and rigorous specifications that are costly to produce. Reward‑hacking, narrow generalization, and the need for domain‑expert spec writing limit autonomous deployment to only a few niche domains (high‑failure‑cost work, tightly defined tasks,…

    Hacker News front pagedank.systems5 minHN487644lobste.rs49
  3. Debugging in My First Language: A Bilingual Developer’s Accidental Discovery

    Switching the language you think and talk in (e.g., from English to your native Spanish) can reduce mental overhead when debugging complex architectural issues, especially when using LLMs like Codex. The author treats bilingualism as a cognitive tool, not a deficit, and recommends deliberately switching languages—or any mental mode—to break through tough problems.

    Atomic Objectatomicobject.com4 min
  4. Article: Your Next DSL Author Is a Language Model

    Typed Domain Grounding (TDG) embeds a DSL inside a mainstream language the LLM already knows (e.g., Kotlin) and uses the host compiler as an oracle. The author describes five building blocks—embedding, choosing a host language with high training‑data frequency, compiler‑driven type safety, a generate‑compile‑repair loop, and an on‑demand teaching tool—and shows measured results from kUML, a Kotli…

    InfoQinfoq.com18 min