proomt

Search

Search posts, papers, and topics

All posts

IBM Research10 min readintermediate

From error mitigation to fault-tolerant quantum computing

Summary

IBM’s blog outlines a practical continuum from quantum error mitigation to fault‑tolerant error correction, highlighting hybrid spacetime codes that achieve ~10× effective error‑rate reduction (64 logical qubits on 76 physical qubits) and a 63× sampling‑overhead cut versus pure mitigation. It describes how post‑selected QEC combined with probabilistic error cancellation, dynamic circuits, and a n…

  • Hybrid spacetime codes (post‑selected QEC) can reduce sampling overhead quartically compared to PEC, achieving ~10× effective gate‑error reduction on a 2,336‑CZ circuit using 64 logical qubits encoded in 76 physical qub…
  • Layering post‑selected QEC with probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) yields far fewer shots than PEC alone while preserving expectation‑value convergence.
  • Dynamic circuits and pulse‑level control in Qiskit let users apply real‑time feed‑forward and decoupling, enabling conditional error‑correction strategies that protect Clifford gates and only mitigate noisy T gates.
  • IBM’s directed execution model (beta) exposes soft measurement data (IQ points) and client‑side mitigation configuration, facilitating custom noise‑learning pipelines with qiskit‑noise‑learning, qiskit‑mitigation, and S…

Bridging the gap between near‑term noisy devices and full fault‑tolerant quantum computers is the biggest bottleneck for practical quantum advantage. IBM’s concrete demonstrations—spacetime codes, hybrid QEC/QEM, and dynamic circuit support—provide a usable toolkit for researchers to push circuit d…

6/10

Related reading

  1. A theoretical separation between quantum computers & LLMs

    The IBM research blog explains two new theoretical results that prove shallow constant‑depth quantum circuits can outperform decoder‑only transformers on a functional task (iterated index) and diffusion language models on a sampling task (parity‑sampling). The proofs give asymptotic separations but are not yet practical.

    IBM Researchibm.com6 min
  2. Java 27 Delivers Post-Quantum Cryptography, Future Language Innovation, Helidon 27, JavaFX 27

    Java 27 ships with nine JEPs—G1 as the default GC, post‑quantum TLS 1.3, lazy constants, primitive‑type patterns, structured concurrency, compact object headers, JFR redaction, Vector API incubator, and PEM encoding preview—plus the first Java Verified Portfolio releases (Helidon 27, JavaFX 27, Jipher 20). The release is a security‑focused, non‑LTS update that paves the way for Project Valhalla f…

    InfoQinfoq.com5 min
  3. Worker Backpressure (Part 1)

    Canva added a lightweight, local backpressure loop to its queue worker library that monitors per‑message success/failure, computes a backoff factor against a configurable failure‑rate set‑point, and throttles the worker’s concurrency. In two real incidents the mechanism kept failure rates under 2 % fleet‑wide, limited DLQ growth to a handful of messages, and maintained throughput without manual i…

    Canvacanva.dev10 min
  4. IBM Built the Cold War’s Most Powerful Code Breaker for the NSA

    IBM’s Harvest (IBM 7950) was a 1960s NSA‑dedicated streaming coprocessor attached to an IBM Stretch mainframe. It ran up to 200× faster than contemporary machines, used a custom bit‑addressable memory model, pipelined parallel streams (P, Q → R), and introduced the world’s first automated tape library. IBM also created a domain‑specific language, Alpha, for cryptanalytic programmers. The article…

    Lobstersieee.org13 minHN10125lobste.rs8
  5. Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Backend Code Generation

    A systematic evaluation of LLM agents generating multi‑file backend code shows a sharp drop in correctness when structural constraints (framework conventions, ORM usage, API contracts) are added. Across 100 tasks in 8 Python web frameworks, assertion pass rates fall ~27 points, with data‑layer bugs (bad queries, ORM violations) driving most failures. Mid‑size models cope with minimal frameworks (…

    arXiv cs.SE (Software Engineering)arxiv.org1 minpaperHN287197