proomt

Search

Search posts, papers, and topics

All posts

Hacker News front page6 min readintermediate

PCB is brought to you by Fable 5

Summary

The author used the AI tool Fable 5 to generate a 4‑layer RP2350 development board for an E‑ink display from a short English description and ordered it from JLCPCB. While the AI handled component placement, it left many DRC errors and routing gaps, requiring manual fixes and highlighting the limits of current AI‑driven PCB design.

  • Fable 5 can generate a complete 4‑layer RP2350 board from a short English prompt, but it produces DRC errors and wrong footprints that need fixing.
  • Freerouting left 49 nets unconnected, while KiCadRoutingTools completed routing in 1.25 s, showing tool choice matters.
  • Manual verification remains essential: 65 DRC errors and mismatched packages required human correction before manufacturing.
  • Ordering from JLCPCB with AI‑prepared files is straightforward, though component availability may need back‑and‑forth adjustments.

Hardware engineers and hobbyists should see both the promise and the pitfalls of AI‑generated PCB layouts before relying on them for production.

6/10

Related reading

  1. Article: Your Next DSL Author Is a Language Model

    Typed Domain Grounding (TDG) embeds a DSL inside a mainstream language the LLM already knows (e.g., Kotlin) and uses the host compiler as an oracle. The author describes five building blocks—embedding, choosing a host language with high training‑data frequency, compiler‑driven type safety, a generate‑compile‑repair loop, and an on‑demand teaching tool—and shows measured results from kUML, a Kotli…

    InfoQinfoq.com18 min
  2. From Individual Experiments to a Shared AI Practice: How Avant Scaled AI-Assisted Engineering

    Avant replaced many personal AI‑assistant setups with a single, organization‑wide Claude Code configuration that embeds the company’s coding standards, project‑tracking links, and documentation. Treated as an internal product, the setup is versioned, owned by delivery engineers, and iteratively improved. The shared tool speeds routine tasks (scaffolding, tests, migrations, docs) and enforces cons…

    Moove-itqubika.com2 min
  3. Every tool is green. Can you ship?

    A CloudBees blog post argues that existing CI, security, and QA tools don’t give release managers a complete view of AI‑generated code risk. It claims tool consolidation rarely helps and proposes a “control plane” (CloudBees Unify) that aggregates signals from multiple tools and adds AI‑driven test prioritization. The piece is largely promotional, with no concrete implementation details, metrics,…

    Codeshipcloudbees.com4 min
  4. CADWorld: Computer-Use Benchmark for Long-Horizon Computer-Aided Design

    CADWorld is a new benchmark suite of 200 long‑horizon mechanical CAD tasks in FreeCAD, covering sketching, part modeling, assembly, CAM, FEM, and more. Agents interact via screenshots and GUI actions; success is checked by executable validation of the saved CAD artifacts. Seven existing agents achieve at most 17.5 % success versus an 87 % expert baseline, highlighting the gap between GUI competen…

    Hugging Face Daily Papersarxiv.org1 minpaper
  5. Should you read the code, is RAG dead, and did Skills kill MCP?

    The article debunks five common AI‑tool hot takes, arguing you still must read AI‑generated code, AI fluency matters in hiring, MCP and Skills serve different purposes, RAG remains useful, and needing fine‑tuning signals a messy codebase. It offers concrete rules for reviewing generated code and integrating AI components responsibly.

    GitHub Oldgithub.blog5 minHN3
  6. Database for AI Agents: 5 Evaluation Criteria

    Databricks outlines five criteria for a production‑ready database for AI agents—branch‑per‑agent isolation, serverless scale‑to‑zero, hybrid search, ACID guarantees, and a unified platform that eliminates ETL lag—illustrating each with features of its Lakebase offering and brief customer anecdotes.

    Databricksdatabricks.com10 min