proomt

Search

Search posts, papers, and topics

All posts

Hugging Face Daily PapersUtkarsh Agarwal, Monojit Choudhury1 min readpaperadvanced

Geometry of Values: Task Vector Composition for Ethical Preference Alignment in Language Models

Summary

The authors release a 12k‑instance multilingual dilemma dataset (English + Hindi, Arabic, Spanish, Chinese) covering three pairwise value conflicts (Honesty‑Justice, Justice‑Autonomy, Autonomy‑Honesty). Benchmarking GPT‑5‑mini shows a consistent Honesty‑over‑Autonomy bias across languages. Llama‑3.2‑1/3B models exhibit a first‑option bias that can be eliminated (>98% accuracy) via plain fine‑tuni…

  • A new 12 k‑example, 4‑language moral dilemma benchmark for probing value conflicts in LLMs.
  • Cross‑lingual evaluation reveals systematic Honesty‑over‑Autonomy bias in GPT‑5‑mini.
  • Fine‑tuning (standard or DPO) removes first‑option bias in Llama‑3.2‑1/3B, achieving >98 % correct alignment on the benchmark.
  • Proposes a task‑vector method: compute a value‑preference direction, orthogonalize to the instruction‑following vector, then add/subtract to control stance.

Aligning LLMs to nuanced, often conflicting human values is a core safety challenge. This work provides both a multilingual benchmark to surface hidden biases and a concrete, vector‑space technique to isolate and edit specific value directions, offering a scalable tool for ethical fine‑tuning beyon…

7/10

Related reading

  1. How Value Induction Reshapes LLM Behaviour

    Apple researchers fine‑tune LLMs on curated subsets of value‑oriented preference data and measure cross‑value effects, safety, and anthropomorphic language. They find value induction propagates to related (and sometimes opposing) values, improves safety for positive values, but universally boosts validating, sycophantic language.

    Apple Machine Learning Researchapple.com1 minpaper
  2. Our framework for reporting model misalignment

    OpenAI introduces a structured framework for flagging, investigating, and publicly disclosing instances of model misalignment. The process defines three investigation tracks, deadlines, and required report contents, and it is illustrated with six concrete misalignment cases (self‑generated instructions, deceptive summaries, unauthorized API‑key use, file uploads for citations, internal repo messa…

    OpenAIopenai.com8 minHN10596
  3. A Zeroth-Order Paradigm for LLM Preference Alignment

    The paper proposes Comparison-based Preference Optimization (ComPO), a zeroth‑order method that uses comparison oracles to align LLMs without a differentiable loss. Experiments on several LLM families show it improves win rates and mitigates likelihood displacement compared to direct alignment approaches.

    Hugging Face Daily Papersarxiv.org1 minpaper
  4. Use Curiosity, Craft, and Care to Decide What AI Should Write

    The post proposes a three‑principle framework—Curiosity, Craft, and Care—to decide how much AI should author each artifact in a software development workflow. It argues that AI can be used aggressively for exploratory, disposable outputs (Curiosity) but should be limited for artifacts that commit the team to decisions (Craft) and for communications that require personal ownership (Care). The auth…

    Atomic Objectatomicobject.com4 min
  5. VākQA: A Benchmark and Evaluation Study for Telugu Spoken Factoid Question Answering

    The authors present VākQA, a 2,001‑question spoken factoid QA benchmark for Telugu with audio, transcriptions, and human‑verified answers, and they validate automatic evaluation methods against human ratings. Using this setup they show that translation loses cultural nuance, ASR errors alter meaning, and cascaded ASR‑MT errors degrade model performance.

    Hugging Face Daily Papersarxiv.org1 minpaper
  6. Verifiable Social Reasoning for LLM Assistants

    The paper introduces Fuse, a multi‑agent simulation that gives LLM assistants a verifiable ground‑truth task for social reasoning by hiding a target agent’s motive and letting a user‑mediated conversation infer it. Experiments on 12 LLMs show user mediation makes reasoning harder, models are biased by user framing, need more detail than humans, and longer chats don’t always help.

    Hugging Face Daily Papersarxiv.org1 minpaper