Hugging Face Daily PapersXiaoya Wang, Yutong Xu, Junjie Wang1 min readpaperintermediate
E2A-Bench: Benchmarking Evidence-to-Action Reliability in Financial Chart Reasoning
Summary
E2A‑Bench is a 969‑query benchmark for financial chart reasoning that evaluates vision‑language models across a full evidence‑to‑action chain using four metrics (UCR, RCI, ECI, NDR). Experiments on 20 VLMs expose hidden failures: low‑UCR models have only 6.4 % directional coverage, oracle‑aided verification cuts unsupported claims but can kill coverage, and fine‑tuning inflates BUY:SELL ratios by…
- Benchmark design: 969 queries derived from 323 HS300 stocks, three input modalities, deterministic OHLCV evidence anchors.
- Metrics: UCR (grounding), RCI (reasoning‑action consistency), ECI (evidence‑confidence calibration), NDR (directional coverage‑aware reliability).
- Findings: Models with high grounding can still rank low on NDR due to poor directional coverage; oracle verification improves claim support but may reduce coverage; financial fine‑tuning skews BUY/SELL predictions drama…
- Implication: Evaluation of financial VLMs must trace the entire evidence‑to‑action pipeline rather than rely on scalar hallucination scores.
Financial decision‑making systems need traceable, calibrated recommendations. By exposing gaps between grounding, confidence, and actionable output, E2A‑Bench provides a more realistic safety net for deploying VLMs in trading or advisory contexts.
8/10



