proomt

Search

Search posts, papers, and topics

All posts

Jake Yesbeck3 min readintro

The Way and Remainder

Summary

The article reflects on the evolution of software development from manual coding to AI‑assisted generation, arguing that human developers are now the "remainder" handling prompts, reviews, and judgment. It warns that hiring criteria and team culture will shift as AI takes over most coding work.

  • AI code generators can produce functional code and tests with minimal human input, moving developers toward prompt engineering and review.
  • Traditional hiring signals (e.g., leetcode performance) become less predictive when tools handle most implementation.
  • Core software practice—understand problem, devise solution, test—remains, but the human contribution focuses on higher‑level design and validation.
  • Cultural debates (tabs vs spaces) lose relevance as AI abstracts away low‑level implementation details.

Software engineers and hiring leaders should care because AI reshapes the skill set needed to stay effective in development teams.

4/10

Related reading

  1. 63% of developers have more work since non-devs began coding with AI, but most say it's good for the industry

    A Zapier survey of 797 U.S. developers finds 63% see more work as non‑technical coworkers use AI coding tools, yet two‑thirds view the shift positively. Developers are moving toward higher‑value strategy, governance, and cross‑functional work, and the top future‑proof skills are security, AI/ML, low‑code QA, strategy, and data engineering.

    Zapier Engineeringzapier.com5 min
  2. How Generative AI Is Changing Modern Software Development

    Generative AI tools can assist developers by producing code snippets, tests, documentation, and debugging hints, but their output must be reviewed and validated. Engineers should adopt prompt‑writing skills and maintain core software‑engineering expertise to use AI safely and productively.

    SitePointsitepoint.com4 min
  3. Evolving programming languages in the AI era

    This post explores how programming languages and their ecosystems might evolve as AI agents write more code, shifting focus from human ergonomics to agent-centric design. It proposes optimizing languages for stronger guarantees and developing agent-friendly tools like queryable program databases and programmatic runtime observability.

    Hacker News front pagedashbit.co9 minHN13798
  4. Should you read the code, is RAG dead, and did Skills kill MCP?

    The article debunks five common AI‑tool hot takes, arguing you still must read AI‑generated code, AI fluency matters in hiring, MCP and Skills serve different purposes, RAG remains useful, and needing fine‑tuning signals a messy codebase. It offers concrete rules for reviewing generated code and integrating AI components responsibly.

    GitHub Oldgithub.blog5 minHN3